By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
code.samurai said:
Bitmap Frogs said:
nitekrawler1285 said:

 

Not all games have to push the most polygons and have high resolution textures to be hits. Ask Nintendo.  Developers just choose to do so ignoring customer demands for a fun product and inflating developement costs for themselves.  If they don't learn to change their developement proccesses then they wont have to worry about it once they have closed their doors because they didn't  get large enough returns on their investment.

 

Low profile graphics only work for the wii and the digital distribution networks. Disc based games with crappy graphics get lambasted by reviews and end up hurting in sales. Up to a certain point it's a better investment (on the HD twins) to bank on graphics and a high price rather than low-fi and budget prices.

Frankly, it's appaling how some of you are pretending to tell them how to run their business just to justify stealing. If you think the vast majority of people hooked on the .25c / game torrented piñata are gonna start buying in droves at 40$, you are sorely mistaken. Only people who BUY games have their decisions impacted by price of the product. People who STEAL don't care about the price sticker. It's been proven over and over.

If someone was stealing your product and had the balls to go tell you how to run your business, what would your reaction be? So far there is NO argument at all justifying piracy that can't be broken down into basically "I am doing it, I like doing it and I want to keep doing it".

I think someone has been learning how to paraphrase and is doing it wrong.  Listen, this is not a pro-piracy thread.  Are you still sore from our argument the other day?  Anyway I just had to butt in because I would like to point out that MMORPGs are mostly flourishing from oh a couple of bucks here and there.  Nothing much.  And you're still missing the point, piracy will always be present but the people who support it will consider something legal if it's affordable.  Why are you so damn adamant on keeping the regular folks away from HD content?  Are you one of those guys who thinks just because you can afford the high price on a regular basis it means you're special?  That's quite sad.

Anyway to close this, the Publishers are reacting incorrectly to piracy and used-game-afficionados.  Many people go to stores and scoff at the prices of HD games, these guys are like you and me only they just don't like paying too much for something that they think is over-priced.  While it may or may not be overpriced seems to still be a matter of opinion (some people just don't have anything better to buy with extra cash I guess) it still remains that the general market does not think that the current pricing of games is a reasonable expense.  And if it's true that Sony and Microsoft are selling their systems at a loss and is making up for it in terms of software sales, boost of their software sales would also boost the popularity of their system.  It's a vicious cycle you see.  It's not really that new.

 

 

Close it my ass. You pretend to be all savvy and talking about things should be done leveraging the fact that the whole industry is subject to a massive stealing, everyday, through the net. This is akin as telling someone how he should do things just because you are clubbing him to death and using the fact that you are allowed to maul him as a justification for your arguments.

Piracy hurts and it hurts the most the small guy. Big exes always will have a job managing content libraries and shareholders will always profit from that but it's the small guys who make a living out of content creation who get the worst deal. Piracy deincentivates investment into new content because profitability has gone way down.

Your arguments crash because as time goes by people are dropping alltogether their spending on pirateable products and replacing it with stacks of fresh DVD's. To most people it's not about "hey, I used to buy 5 movies a year, now I'll still buy 5 and pirate 100". They eventually switch to 100% free-for-all p2p action.

Your whole argument boils to "hey, people can get games for free! if the companies do what I tell them to do, they'll stop doing it". But that's bollocks. HD games cost that much because all it's left for the companies is milking the people that still buy games. Viva Piñata released at 40$, where are the massive sales? Banjo will debut at 40$, you think it'll sell to the torrent crowd? The 360 has a large library of discounted games, how come those aren't hitting the top of the lists? Here's a hint: because once you get used to paying 0.25c for a game, you aren't gonna pay 10$. The music industry has been dealing with this ever since the 90's. And sure, iTunes works well - but it's nowhere near making up for the differences in revenue from before the p2p days.

And frankly, tell me since when stealing something you can't afford is kosher. Everyone wants a porsche or a ferrari, how come there aren't people assaulting the vendors? because jacking a car gets you in the jail. This just about consecuence-free stealing - that's the only reason this thing got big. Everything else is just chatter.

The day someone breaks into your house and get your flat tv stolen I hope the thief later phones you to tell you how it was his right to steal your TV because he can't buy one.





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).