I think we should wait until IGN releases their review, because one thing I've learnt from the GT comparison videos and raging fanboys online, is that when the difference is very little, which one looks better is actually very subjective.
So, it could be that IGN thought the earlier build had better graphics then the 360 version (and were wrong according to majority) and they say in the final review they are, OR perhaps PSM3 is judging bioshock too harshly, expecting a huge difference because they believe the PS3 is leaps and bounds above the 360, when in fact it does look better, but not by enough for these editors to get over their ego's.







