Kasz216 said:
I guess.... but I mean he wants to double or triple it. Which has way more serious complications then McCain's plan. The UN and US biofuels programs are said to be about 33% of the inflation of global food prices according to the UN. (If i remember correctly, i know it's seen as the highest problem. With speculation being second highest at 30%.) The EU makes around 1.5 Billion liters per year i believe. The US 5 Billion galons. Seeing as there a 3 liters in a galon about... That's about .5 Billion. galons. Making the US largely resonsible for that 33% increase. Doubling or tripling that is going to be catostropic, driving another 50-60 million people into starvation worldwide. That's a pretty big kernal of shit if you ask me. Compared to McCain saying he would get rid of all Ethanol subsides... which would pull a bunch of starving people back to the table. Obama's energy policy is more damaging then the entire Iraq war was. Just not to us... so people aren't going to care as much. |
Firstly let me say I think biofuel production on land that should be used for crops is wrong, other and better alternative fuels need to be found. I believe that biofuels should be made but from algae rather than food crops as algae can be grown without using up arable land.
However Brazil produces nearly as much ethanol as the USA, it is the second largest producer in the world and is very close to the US indeed.








