I agree that it's all opinions. One person's trash is another's treasure. However I do find it ironic that a lot of people on this site, and that goes to members of all gaming persuasions, tend to use Metacritic and reviews to their advantage when it's convenient and dismiss them when it goes against their argument. Basically, how many people here saying that the reviews shouldn't be considered or really matter are going to be the same people posting up the first reviews for their favorite games this Fall on the site? I'm sure if I even step back to big releases this past year I would find a few culprits in those threads responding positively or negatively to something they are dismissing as irrelevant in this very same topic. Oh, and for the 360 fans that think they'll quote me for truth, don't bother. Most of you are the exact same way.
I personally don't use Metacritic as measure for what I enjoy, but I do take note and understand that it does work to a large extent. Somehow they do manage to seperate the Ninjabreadman's from the Super Smash Bros. and much of the rest in between, so yes I do take it more seriously than one man's opinion.
To the OP: The answer is not opinion. That's much too easy and doesn't explain why it's the 360 that is known as the better library. The reason is because:
1. There are more 360 owners in the world
2. The 360 has a wide breadth of well made games within genres, especially popular ones on messageboards like FPSes, RPGes, etc. Because of this, there is a higher percentage you will hear it has a better library. However, that isn't going to convince the guy that plays Warhawk 30 hours a week passionately, and that is where the opinion kicks in. There are more games on the 360 but it only takes a few special ones to really make a console for you.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
