Editorial: Nintendo’s Wii Is The Gaming Industry’s Financial Scapegoat

[robjoh]

robjoh said:

Killzone3 said:

robjoh said:
I have a question can you get banned for creating a thread, point out an articel and say it was a good read and then disaper with out answering any of those claiming that it is rubish. I think this thread is as close to trolling you can get, and so far I haven't seen Killzone3 explain why he thought it was a good read.

LOL wii fanboys dont like a thread because its does not talk good things about the wii its trolling, this is really priceless.

 

 

 

No actualy that isn't the problem dear killzone3, my problem is that you so far haven't explained what in the articel you thought was good. I read the articel and comment on it above. I personally think that it is strange that he jumps from Wii is only selling crap to Crap games isn't selling and so on.

I also thinks that he has a strange view on the game he is pointing out, I also belive that he is wrong about the sales for RE4, so far I have not seen you answer those claims of mine. Of course neither I belive that you will because honestly you and Hus often make hit and run raids. I have no problem with saying that so far the 3rd party support for Wii is crap, the reason why I have no problem with this is that I belive that is the case. BUT I do think the articel is crap because it is written in a way that first argument for that Nintendo should ban bad games, last time they put restrictions on 3rd parties PS1 beated the crap out of everyone becuase 3rd party rather supported PS1. Then it argument that Wii owners doesn't buy those crappy games, OMG what a supprise. Then it claims that the RE4 sales was bad when it in reality is close to the shippment target for Capcom.

After that it goes back to argument that again Nintendo has to make the 3rd party stop published crappy games and that someone has to do something about it. I mean if the Wii owners isn't buying the games who the f--k cares what the publisher sents out?

Now this is the second time I comment the articel so far I have just seen YOU back in this thread when some of us started to ask why this articel was so great. Can you please point out, please qoute if you can, what pieces of the articel you think is a good read and we can mayby have an argument about the articel, something that is very hard to do if you don't enter the thread except when we call you troll. 

  

I just wanted to bump this to see if Killzone3 return and comments on the articel, if he doesn't I will report him for flamebait and hit and run tactics. If you start a thread argument in it or just stop.

Other than that the post above is a good answer to Hus

Hus said:

Question for all those that out right disagree with the article, did you even read it ? and if you did what specific paragraph is so wrong in your opinion ?

Many of you seem so angry, i just want to know what caused it.

by the way Hus it was the second time I answered to it, mayby read the thread before you post?