By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Sqrl said:


She is far from the blundering idiot cafferty tried to make her out to be based on a single answer from an interview.  Alaska has a 5 billion dollar surplus and just about every facet of their large-business economy is doing well (fishing, mining, drilling, etc..), and while oil prices have helped, things like that don't just happen.  Of course from what I've seen of the economic debate in Alaska over the past few weeks the anti-Palin position is that everything that is going well in Alaska is attributed entirely to a non-Palin factor. 

On energy: Your point is she embellished her state's importance?  So that makes her unqualified?  I'm confused because now you're saying its her strong suit but earlier in this thread you said she was clueless on energy.

 

I said strongest. Of the big three, that is. Her statement about Alaska's importance is not very informed, and the one about renewables is a plain disgrace. Maybe one of her first few trips should be to Denmark where the biggest electricity source is wind, or perhaps Sweden where half of electricity comes from hydro power.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957