NJ5 said:
I am able to reconcile it, very easily actually (in fact I already have in another post). In no way does it "shatter my narrative", and I find it laughable that you would suggest so: I know many populist politicians who have a great record with the populations they work with. This can easily be the case here, given that Alaska is a small and isolated place. Do you think it's outlandish to suggest Palin might be one of those populist politicians? Saying "Alaskans like her" is a legit point, no doubt about that. I just don't think it's nearly enough to counter the ignorance she has been displaying regarding the issues which really matter for the presidency.
|
I'm not seeing how you've reconciled with it, you've marginalized it again and then tried to call it reconciliation perhaps.
But if we want to talk about laughable we only have to look at the overreaction to some of the interview questions and we can see whats going on here. Bush doctrine hysteria ring a bell? Or if we get more specific to you, one of my favorite laughable moments was when you linked to an article written by one of her most vehement political enemies in Alaska. Its laughable because you either didn't know (which speaks to how little research you've done on her) or didn't care how blatant you were being with the bias.
But this is kind of pointless since we both know we aren't going to see eye to eye on this. I think you've gone blind with bias and I'm sure you think the same of me.








