Palin: the great debater?

[Phendrana]

bigjon said:

The Ghost of RubangB said:
Yes, there is a difference between an interview and a debate, but they both involve answering questions, which Palin isn't good at. She's good at reading a teleprompter at the RNC, but her speech was all buzzwords, attacks on Obama, attacks on the media, and buzzwords.

She has totally fucked up every interview she's ever had. I'm not counting the Hannity piece, since he shoved his entire head up her ass before it was finished.

#1. The RNC was the first time she had ever used a teleprompter.

#2. The only Obama interview has done that can even be compared to Palin's CG and CC interviews is the one he did with O'Relly. O'Reilly was tough on him, but did not try and trip him up with gotcha questions. Read the transcript of Gibson's and Courics Obama interviews. I think you will find something similiar to that Hannity gave Palin. Let me reiforce this, in the last 6 months (since I have been following things) Obama has yet to be treated like Palin was by CC and CG. He has been softballed.

 

It's been 3 days since McCain made up that stupid phrase and I've already seen you use it at least 3 times. You don't need to parrot everything he says. The "liberal" media isn't out to get the conservatives. Katie Couric isn't exactly known for her hardball journalism. Her interview asked some pretty mild questions that should've been easy to answer for someone running for VP.

I really don't want her to do terrible tonight. As much as you think we want her to fail, I would much rather have a competent VP than some egotistical amusement from watching another train crash.