bardicverse said:
Industry context, my friend. How the industry is reacting to the systems, not what some no name wrote his viewpoint on in the article. Articles on gaming sites are pretty useless when it's dominated with one person's perspective. That said, my point about the Wii was just from the actual shifts proven, games announced, etc - actual facts you can see and touch. Several PS3 projects were canned earlier this year and late last year, thus referring to the point of loss of developers for the PS3. Now, there are new projects surfacing, thus it is more of a breakeven number to what the PS3 started with for developer support. I don't doubt that the PS3 will be more supported, as it is holding its own against the 360. I'm just saying that the point made in the article is a bit sensational. Developers always have backed the PS3. The author treats the PS3 as if it were the unknown console that developers stayed away from. That award goes to the Wii, as many devs didn't know what to make of it. This is simple recent history, really not much to argue about here.
|
No one is arguing that PS3 projects have been cancelled, but for the most part the 360 and PS3 share the majority of multi-platform games (the context) here. So those games have nothing to do with the Wii. But don't forget that the article also makes clear that there is still demand for the 360. So please stop trying to derail this thread.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.







