Killzone3 said:
Lamia98 said:
How is Killzone3 not banned? does ioi have him on the Sony fanboy endangered species list or something? |
Thats right ban everyone that does not agree with the wii doctrine. |
No, just those who troll forums with baseless acusations of anyone console being forced over another. This thread was made a battle ground by you, not the Wii Aluminati.
leo-j said:
Hawk said:
Killzone3 said:
Hawk said:
Ya know. I like how it's been explained the the PS2 did so well because it had huge 3rd party support. And tons of those 3rd party games were crappy. But now, that the Wii is getting 3rd party support, and inevitablely crappy 3rd party games come along with that, it's a terrible thing.
::shakes head:: |
Yes but also it had plenty GREAT 3rd party games, wii does not have those. Its just a small difference. |
Wii has plenty of great 3rd party games on the way. Admittedly not much quality 3rd party games have come out so far, but 3rd parties admitted to being slow to realizing the potential of the Wii and got a late start. So I'm still not sure why the 3rd party support is a negative thing. |
Im sorry but it doesnt... I searched through gamespot, and I couldnt find good interesting action adventure games like mario and zelda. Seriously I think the only good games are rayman and the mario/zelda games :/
|
Almost all of the major japanese third party developers have announced the devotation of massive amounts of projects and development to the Wii. The Wii caught everyone off guard. Just because it's too early for the titles to be announced yet doesn't mean they aren't comming. Also, unlike Sony, Nintendo doesn't need to broadcast all of thier future games two years in advanced to get people excited about their console. It's a simple difference in how business is done and a typical case of people using Sony as the measure for how other companies' behaviors should be weighed.
