Rath said:
So lets throw out a hypothetical situation - the economy does collapse due to this bailout not being passed and the government loses out big time (Lets say $7Tril). Would you find this prefferable to the government trying to prevent this problem and losing $700B? (Both numbers are pulled out of my arse, I have no idea what a depression would cost the government and with this deal losing all 700B would require some extreme incompetence.)
|
Yes.
First off, the Great Depression was caused my the government not following the constitution, and this economic crisis is created for the same reasons, but let's not go there for the purpose of this discussion.
We are broke. We have no money. The way we deal with that, is just make more up. This is a bad idea. It devalues all the money, and causes inflation. This means the poor get poorer. Who cares if banks lend money if no one can afford to pay for a loan.
We got into this mess because the government tried to pull up the lower class through questionable means. If the bailout happens, the government is going to punish the lower class through questionable means.
The market went up today. A day the government did nothing. If we were really in the economic position to have a great depression, the market would continue to fall. We are no where close to what it would take to enter a depression. But we are back on economics again....
It's hard to talk about an economic problem without talking about economics.







