vlad321 said:
Bitmap Frogs said:
vlad321 said:
Bitmap Frogs said:
vlad321 said:
Bitmap Frogs said:
vlad321 said:
Again, if they didn't have time to include what was promised for a while what ensures that they polished the game enough? No matter which way you look at it they should have pushed the game back. A few weeks never hurt anyone. |
But it will include what was promised. Why does it matter it's available for download instead of on the disc? Do you have some kind of fetish hate for downloadable content?
By the way, do you even own a 360 or ps3?
|
Wasn't it mentioned earlier bugs and unforseen circumstances pop up all the time? Are they gonna have the time to fix all the bugs in the netcode as well in between? Also, I love downloadable content, as long as it's not somethign that should have been on the hard copy of the game (or the Steam dowload...).
Personally no, but in our apartment we have 4 wiis and 2 PS3 and 2 360s split between 6 TVs. My best friend dating back from 10th grade owns one of the PS3s and 360s and since I've been rooming with him sicne day one up here 've basically had unlimited access to all 3 consoles, 1 of the Wiis is mine. They have some good games and I plan on playing LBP and Fable 2 when they will be inevitably bought, but I don't expect to be blown away at all. Learned my lesson from Fable 1 and since hearing this my Fable 2 expectations dropped even more.
|
So you don't own the consoles, there's no loss of promised functionality at launch and here you are bitching to high heavens because of something that's not an issue.
If the internet didn't exist you'd probably chain yourself to a tree on some construction site. I can't believe you're still posting in this thread to defend your e-honor after you got mad-owned several posts ago with the whole online fiasco. You really want to save face.
Oh yeah, and there's no need for the online patch to be on the hard copy. Suck it up.
|
Yea, this does not affect me and my future expereince with the games in any way shape or form unless, as already stated, they just plain outright rushed the game and there will be other issues besides the lack of the promised content. I don't see how hard it is to grasp the fact that not adding a feature and later patching it in, whether it's on day 1 or not, is a sign of a rushed game. If it wasn't rushed they wouldn't have had a content patch on day 1. If they felt that they MUST have a patch then maybe they would have been more concerned with any other problems that arose from testing between going gold and release.
|
You have no proof of such rushing, you are just assuming. Content patch on day one might as well mean they actually polished the game even more. And you are still posting on this thread because you got owned and laughed at for raising a non issue. As yourself have stated it won't affect your game experience at all.
You just can't take straight the fact you lambasted this for hurting users when it in fact does not. You can stonewall this one as long as you like, but I'll keep posting until the game ships, scores high on the reviews and it proves you wrong. If it's needed I'll keep the thread alive until then.
|
Me too, but I'm willing to make a wager on this so as to not spam the forums.
|
Lol no. I won't let you go that easily. You'll keep stonewalling this one with your "fable 2 rushed" nonsense until you get shamed.
You arguments were discredited several posts ago and you are now just staying alive out of assumptions which can't be disputed as they are just speculative opinion. It's a crappy move and I'll keep lambasting you for it.
