Nancy Pelosi needs to be fired.

[Sqrl]

totalwar23 said:

Sqrl said:

NJ5 said:

Kasz216 said:

That's just not true at all... not that it's any indication of common sense... but she's demonstrated how she's had trade negotiations with many foreign countries.

 

Not true? I've seen at least two clips where she talks about her geographical proximity with Russia when asked about her foreign policy experience.

I haven't heard of these trade negotiations... Google's results for palin "trade negotiations" aren't very promising:

Palin's mysterious trade missions - War Room - Salon.com

NO PALIN TRADE MISSIONS WITH RUSSIA ON RECORD - New Developments ...

(etc...)

 

The first link is a liberal news site and the second is a forum =P

 

I believe the point is that if you google trade missions with palin, that's all you'll get. Not very promising if she has demonstrated how she has all of these "trade missions" with other countries.

Oh yes, I hate S. Palin. I can accept Obama as President. I can accept McCain as President. I can accept Biden as President. No way in hell, though, is Palin qualify for the Executive.

 

Well lets do a small comparison:

Just curious were you aware of Obama's previous executive experience in which he was given $110 million to spend on Chicago schools to improve them from last in the nation?  I would assume not since the CAC's own investigation into their results found they had little or no impact.  On the other hand Palin negotiated a nearly $40 billion pipeline running through Canada (requires negotiations with Canada) with terms so good for Alaskans that people told her initially that it could never be done.

PS - A highly edited daily show video isn't exactly giving me the context of the comment, it gives me the context that John Stuart finds is most funny.  Considering he is a liberal I think we can both agree how useless the video is at providing the context for the comment.  And of course Kasz has already pointed out more of the context anyways.