I love the kind of lose-lose argument these guys use. Scenario 1 - Wii gamers buy crappy ports and mini games = They are all non-gamers/casual they would not recognize a good game. Scenario 2 - Wii gamers do not buy crappy games and go with high quality (most of the time) Nintendo games = They are so casual that they bough the Wii just for Wii sports. 25-30% of Wii onwers buying Zelda is just a stupid detail.
The truth is simple, Wii ruined their fanboy fantasies. Wii is more of a party crasher console than a party console for them. They are always making Nintendo look bad even when there is no logic into their claims. If the Wii is cheap, Nintendo is screwing us with dated technology. If it sells more than twins porn, Nintendo is creating an artificial demand. If 3rd parties make crappy games, Nintendo is at fault for allowing games to be developed for the Wii (yes they should not let them make games at all). If Nintendo make games for my girlfriend, mom and grandpa they just abandoned me. I wonder where all those "hardcore gamers", that feel threatened by its success, were in the GameCube days. So when they focus on hardcore games they are the kiddy system, when they try to expand the market they are destroying the game business.
Satan said:
"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."
