By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Great gameplay + Bad graphics >> Bad gameplay + Great graphics
Great gameplay + Great graphics is IMO >> Great gameplay + Bad graphics

In addition things like game complexity, presentation, off-line / online functionality (online leaderboards, co-op, multiplayer, trophies, etc), story telling and audio also matter. How much the different aspects matter depends on type of game.

A Pacman game is a less demanding game gerne, but still I much prefer Edgar M Vigdal's Deluxe Pacman (on Amiga and PC, shareware) better than emulating the original arcade game, with its much improved graphics in addition to the many newly added game ideas. IMO Pacman on the Atari 2600 sucks... (nomatter how well the game sold for its time!)

Atari 2600 Pacman:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6paQTUtV89g

 



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales