Forbes: How Sony Should Respond to a Disruptive Attack (PS3 vs. Wii)

[XboxSoldier12]

leo-j said:

azzer100 said:

leo-j said:

marc said:

Doubt the ps3, as much as you want ounce that $399.99 price tag is here we will be seeing who is in the lead.

are you forgetting that once the ps3 gets to $399.99 the wii  could be at $150 or even $100.

THEN we will see who is in the lead!

Some sony fanboys seem to think that only the ps3 is gonna go down in price.

Miyamoto: OH no the ps3 is starting to sell like crazy!!

I have an idea!! Lets not make millions of dollars and start loosing money by cuting the price of the wii to $149.99!!!!

 

 

Seriously do you like actually take pride in how bitter and resentful you are over the PS3's situation? Reading your posts is like listening to Dick Cheney angrily defend the war in Iraq during political debates.

On Topic though, do you honestly think there is no way for the parts or production of the Wii to actually become cheaper? Is it unfathomable to think that perhaps they could sell a Wii for $200 or $150 in the a year or two and still make a profit?

Even then how come the idea of Nintendo selling their product at a loss in any scenario is unfathomable, but Sony doing it is perfectly fine? Considering Nintendo now has more money than Sony, wouldn't logic dictate that they are ones better suited for such a manuver, not Sony? Or are you snidley suggesting that it can't happen because Nintendo is just a money whore who should be faulted for doing something as absurd as actually turning a profit on their product while Sony, a faceless vertical monopoly, is the only one who obviously really cares about gaming and is willing to take a loss for the good of the consumer. Yeah, good luck selling that one.