I figured out why the Wii's attach rate is lower than it could be

[BoleroOfFire]

theprof00 said:

BoleroOfFire said:

theprof00 said:
hah bolero, you bring so much good material to the site.
Nice how you don't even say anything in any thread, just talk about the posters. noone cares (me being someone who is looking out for you!!)

I'm just saying that there are many ways to test things and figure out correlations, and it really depends on which tests you are looking at because they each tell you different things.

some people here would like to only look at one side of the equation, and call the other side "flamebait" or "fanboyism"

Hmm... unless my memory fails me, I remember contributing quite a lot to your pointless thread the other day. More than I should have actually. If you want to point out someone who doesn't contribute anything of value, look no further than the mirror. You propose the dumbest threads, fail to pose a well-formed question, try to present your opinions and emotions as facts, attempt to degrade the arguments of others, and resort to insults when they disagree with your opinions. I recall you questioning my literacy when I disagreed with 2 of your 3 'Wii is a toy' threads. (I found that particularly amusing coming from a person who has yet to construct a proper sentence and continuously utilizes poor diction). In the end, I even doubt your reasoning capabilities; you went as far as implying in one of your redundant threads that a friend request is synonymous with agreement. But please, keep posting! You make me lol every once in a while.

1. yeah you contributed a lot of: "Games are toys stupid"; obviously a logical and intelligent conversation.
nice one on the mirror thing btw.

2. I proposed, no, stated, that miyamoto thought there was a difference in games and toys, and then i agreed with him.

3. i questioned your literacy because you "changed" key words in my statements. Do not make me go quote them, toy.

4. wow, criticizing my word choice. you poor sod.

5. well i got messages saying they agreed. But you know, you can continue being wrong, or you can stop arguing and wait for me to be wrong again instead of digging this up over and over, which is what i see you doing for every comment i make. :P

PS: sheathe your sword Webster/Mirriam/Oxford whatever you call yourself.
PPS: i created you and i can destroy you *shakes fist*

 

1. Using a real DEFINITION to support my argument is logical and intelligent.  Using your OPINION that a video game is not a toy to support your own skewed perception is ignorant.  Thank you for noting that. 

2. Video games fall under a subdivision of toys.  What you or anyone else THINKS is irrelevant to that FACT.  You even tried to use Miyamoto's position in Nintendo as support for your argument.  Who does that?

3 & 4. Double standard, anyone?  You called me illiterate, I retaliated.  Cause and effect.  And seriously, learn how to write.   

5. ZOMG!!! 2 whole people agreed with you?!!!  Go back to your threads, everyone else disagreed with you.  What does that tell you?    Btw, are you admitting that you're wrong at the end of that run-on sentence?

PS - I call myself: BoleroOfFire.

PPS - Ooh, well in that case I take back everything I said!  Please don't smite me, oh mighty 'creator'! 

PPPS - I was being sarcastic in that last statement.  I thought you might have trouble grasping that since you believed this thread was serious.

OT: 12 Wii games and more on the way (hopefully).