ssj12 said:
Ail said:
ssj12 said:
Kasz216 said:
ssj12 said:
please win please. EA needs to learn that DRM isnt the answer as long as you have a great game. Take for example The Witcher. CD Projekt Red doesnt have DRM built in and its selling well due to the fact its an amazing game. The only reason I'm downloading the enhanced edition DVD file is because I can't get the free upgrade patch to work. I own the original and they offer all bonus material for free. So I;m not even pirating the game since it is a free upgrade anyways with the original. |
I think DRM can be an answer.... just not like the Securom kind.
The kind where one copy can only be online at once, and it beign tied to one EA account. Thats "good" DRM.
The kind that installs on your computer for no reason and limited installs are the "Bad" kind.
In my opinion anyway.
|
but you dont even really need DRM for that, just an online account based system fior multiplayer features.
|
Just make it so that you have to log in online to play any game be it single player or online player..( ' But I don't have online access when I play from a remote island in the middle of the pacific during my vacations !'...)
PS : I highly doubt this lawsuit has any chance of winning. The impact on any software company that doesn't clearly state what is installed when you install their product would be way too huge...
|
like I said, if a games good it will sell DRM or not and blocking single player gameplay with a login limits use too. Just have an off-line mode and and online mode for online gameplay.
Really look at all of Blizzard's RTSs. Battle.net needs an login but there is still the single player. I'm pretty sure no one here will say that none Blizzard's games don't sell.
|
It helps that for most Blizzard games multiplayer is the strongest component of the game, even a game like Diablo2 there are items and runewords you can only get on battlenet..
PS3-Xbox360 gap : 1.5 millions and going up in PS3 favor !
PS3-Wii gap : 20 millions and going down !
