Riachu said:
twesterm said:
kergeten said:
twesterm said:
Stats87 said:
SmokedHostage said:
Final Fantasy PEAKED at VI, so no it's not important anymore. Final Fantasy VII only sold on shock value. "Oh my god, a 3-D Final Fantasy not on a Nintendo Console? The world is ending!" |
Then why did FFVIII and FFX sell 8M+
Also, FFIX, X-2 and XII with 5M+ is hardly poor sales
FFXIII will sell at least 7M on the PS3/360
|
Because games can sell purely on name and not quality. Seriously, the FF games over the last, what, 10 years have sucked pretty hard. They only sell because people think they're supposed to think they're awesome.
|
Are you actually saying that ff 8,9 and 10 and 12 sucked? Compared to what? just a week a ago i tried space siege, now that sucked, even dungeon siege sucked, diablo got boring fast, and the only good tolkien-esc game that is good is oblivion.
You are either ignorant or too one sided, cuz those final fantasy games are leagues ahead of the vast majority of games.
|
Well, IX was good but I'm pretty sure that was an accident.
- VIII - worst of the whole series. The story wasn't anything special and I'm sure Keanu Reeves would do a wonderful job playing the part of Squall.
- X - It wasn't bad but it wasn't good either. I never really felt anything for the characters, the story wasn't anything special at all, and all in all the game just really wasn't that memorable.
- XII - Almost as bad as VIII. People keep telling me it gets better the further you get into it but I've tried it on two seperate occasions and stopped at about 16 or so hours both times because I just couldn't take anymore. The story was terrible and the characters were just so bad.
|
You didn't find FFX memorable in anyway. Believe me, a lot of people are going to hate you as many consider FFX to be one of the Best post VII FF games.
|
That really isn't saying much.
