Soriku said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Soriku said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Soriku said:
blazinhead89 said:
Soriku said:
blazinhead89 said: Soriku Sony could Moneyhat Rockstar like their Microsoft cousin does |
So? MS can as well. So can Nintendo. But we're seeing no action.
|
Excactly, So there can be HD Exclusives Don't think Nintendo would Moneyhat, besides, Nintendo Don't Need to, |
lol that's not what I meant with MS :P MS supposed moneyhats have mostly made games multiplatform. If anyone wants some exclusive Rockstar game, they need to moneyhat and usually fund the game. Sony was funding LA Noire but stopped. Sony's commitment to stuff like that isn't very strong, as you can see :3
@Obliterator
What does that have to do with anything at all?
Besides, I'm not anti HD consoles.
@obie
lol. :P
|
Your kidding me...Your always opposing HD exclusives.
Anti: A person who is opposed to something, such as a group, policy, proposal, or practice.
|
Why would I impose HD exclusives again? If an HD game goes multiplatform it's going to go to the PS3 or the 360, neither of which I own so why would I care?
|
You opposing games to be exlusive on say a 360. Not both, only one console. As for your question, you want Nintendo to get all the exclusives, this is very clear from what you post.
|
lol. If that was the case why am I not opposing ToV? Or GeoW? Or SO4? Or Lost Odyessey? Or Blue Dragon? Or whatever? And why am I not opposing MGS4? Why am I not opposing Valkyria Chronciles? Why am I not opposing Disgaea 3? Why am I not opposing Infamous?
You fail pretty hard.
|
Denial...Your always trying to say Hd exclusives are gone. The fact is that they aren't.