cwbys21 said:
Yes it does keep us stuck with a 2 party system, but that would have to change from the state level I believe. They decide how they will cast their votes in the Electoral College, not by Federal rules. The Feds only say how many votes each state gets, otherwise why would anyone in states like Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, North or Sout Dakota go to the polls? The blue states have the most people and if it was purely by popular vote then everything else wouldn't matter because the smaller population states would have no effect on who was president and you would have a lot of very angry people. In fact those states and others in the mid west might leave the union because they wouldn't be fairly represented. |
Yeah, the American system has many checks and balances to prevent a tyranny of the majority and does (about) as well as you can if you're electing a single individual to an executive position. Now, it would be interesting to see what would happen if you used proportionate representation to vote for an executive branch that worked like a board of directors ... I suspect that it would be more representative of the views of the public, but that also means that it would (probably) be stuck in a constant dead-lock.







