The Ghost of RubangB said:
Also, the electoral vote is redistrubted once every 10 years, so every 10 years California is way behind in electoral power. The population (and thus % of popular vote) here grows insanely fast, but our % of electoral vote grows super slow in big steps decades apart. At any given election, your vote in Ohio is worth more than my vote in California. Not to mention that the Electoral College mandates that campaigns only care about swing states. And Ross Perot got 18.9% of the popular vote in 1992!!! Then 8.8% in 1996. Either way, the electoral college has become a scam that keeps us stuck with a 2 party system and makes the popular vote meaningless. It's a good way to distribute Congressmen and Senators, sure, but they don't need to re-calculate votes based on those numbers anymore. |
Yes you are correct. States like CA, Florida, S.C., Texas, Arizona, Neveda, and N.M. would be a bit higher now than they were last census, and states like Illinois, Mich, Wis, P.A., NY, and such would be a tad lower. But I do not think it affect the election too much. Since some are red states and some are blue. Maybe 2-4 points overall.
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.







