akuma587 said:
Congratulations. I am always impressed with people who overcome adversity and attain whatever it is they desire. I honestly have no problem with libertarian principles whatsoever, but sometimes people mistakenly label a certain politician's or Congress's actions as libertarian. A libertarian is essentially for the government interfering with normal social relations as little as possible. In an economic sense, this would mean not showing favoritism to ANY group. Democrats tend to show favoritism to the poor, while Republicans tend to show favoritism to the rich. But Republicans are often considered to be closer to libertarian principles. This is true to an extent. Deregulation is in line with libertarian principles, but passing legislation that allows a certain industry to gain an inherent advantage over the market, such as not allowing foreign prescription drug companies to import drugs due to "safety" (another way of saying that domestic prescription drug companies paid the government off once you have analyzed the facts), does not follow libertarian principles because it shows favoritism. Republicans usually don't stick to libertarian principles even if people claim they do, they often shift the market so that it is disadvantageously in favor of larger companies, which contradicts what a libertarian stands for, government neutrality. John McCain, for instance, says that we should allow the free market to lower insurance premiums. That wouldn't be so much of a problem if the government had not already given insurance companies a loaded deck. They can unreasonably discriminate on who they choose to insure, they can pressure hospitals/doctors into accepting what they want to pay rather than what the hospital/doctor would normally charge, and the policy holder has little to no power in challenging a decision to drop their coverage even if they have been paying premiums for twenty years. That is completely against libertarian principles. A free market would be more advantageous to a potential policy holder than it is now. I am comfortable with a libertarian relaxing of standards on some areas of the market, but I hate it when people try to claim that helping out the "big guy" and hurting the "little guy" is in line with libertarian principles. That is simply incorrect.
|
You know you come across as an elitist right? With this, and your '"potential' equality in our society" comment. If I am only potential equal to you, I guess that makes me less they you in reality?
Starting life in different places is far different then equality.
I don't have time for a long reply to this, but I will reply to it. I have some comments about medical care, and one thing that would make it very easy to reduce cost by 90%.







