As I read it they're clearly stating that for high content volume games:
PC = best due to large HDD (pretty obvious really)
PS3 = next best due to 25GB or so BR
360 = third due to 6 to 8 GB DVD
Also while nothing was cut from the final design its also clear from his words than the final design involved some design decisions based on 360 being the lowest common denominator - i.e.
The conclusion - without mandatory HDD 360 needs multiple disks for games that would be single disk on PS3 or install on PC.
Is that really so surprising? This was the same when PS3/360 launched. One has a smaller maximum disk storage than the other.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







