tuoyo said:
I think it has to be subjective. Console A has 1000 great games while Console B has 20 great games. Consumer 1 is interested in 2 games on Console A and 18 games on Console B. Console B is obviously the greater console for him. The fact that Console A has 1000 great games is irrelevant because 1. Unless you are Bill Gates you can't afford to buy 1000 games on 1 console 2. Unless you are Bill Gates son and decided to never get a job or education and just live of your dad's wealth you would never have enough time to play those games 3. Consumer 1 is interested in more games on Console B than on Console A
|
Perhaps, but the person who likes the console with fewer good games should be able to look at a situation without bias, no? I mean, can someone say the Atari Lynx or Wonderswan were better than the DS? The virtual Boy better than the PS2? I know those are extreme, but I'm just trying to show something. When you compare Dreamcast or SNES to PS2 then I think things get more subjective, I'll admit. But there has to be SOME kind of console hierarchy.








