By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
twesterm on 02 August 2007
Edit Thread
Killzone3 said:
twesterm said:
Killzone3 said:
twesterm said:
Killzone3 said:
By the way 1up gave Shadowrun 8/10 even with a full price of 59.99

And its average is around 68%. What's your point?


They are bias thats the point.

Its ok i did not expect any better from vgc.


It could also just be a different reviewer that didn't factor in price. Gamespy gave Shadowrun a 2.0 where one of the gripes was the price. OMG BIASED!!!

They do in fact mention the price in their review for Shadowrun and perhaps that was the game that finally made them start factoring that in. They could have finally got tired of people charging too much for games and this is what they're doing about it. Personally, I'll be happy if they start sticking it to developers for charging too much and might just make me respect 1up a little bit more.

-edit-
My BBC was showing >_>

 


Are you that slow. Warhawk is NOT full price the headset that comes with it you can get for $20 at amazon.

So simple math the PSN game by it self should cost $40

 


I actually know nothing about the game (and don't really care to) other than you said it costs $60 and comes with a headset. I was simply assuming it was a game like Shadowrun with only a limited amount of single player and multiplayer content and not something that was worth $60.

-edit-
And  $60 is full price, even with the  accessory. If they don't offer a version without the headset, then that's just rediculous.  Since you're saying it's a PSN game, then I'm assuming it can be downloaded and then I do have to wonder what all the fuss is about.  Otherwise, there should be no reason to pay $60 for a PSN game.  If people really want a headset, they either already have one or can just as easily get one elsewhere and probably for cheaper.