By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zsidane said:
leo-j said:
zsidane said:
I really think that one of the big mistakes MS did, is releasing a SKU without a HDD. Maybe if the HDD was in all 360s, MS could have avoided PGR4 size problems and giving Sony a shot to say that they were always right by choosing BD for the PS3...
Not forgetting that XBLA games would be able to use more space!

Microsoft was giving the consumer a choice to buy hard drive, there's a reason why there console is only 300buks, unlike sony that forces you to purchase the harddrive increasing the amount of money you would have to waste.


 Well, sometimes, you gotta make that chose for the consumer, and people with a Core 360 must feel like they have been raped when they'll try to buy all stuff now!

Yeah because companies are always looking out for my best interest.  Sony made the choice for me to have a blu-ray player which just made it too danm expensive for me to afford.  Would I like to play resistance of man or Motorstorm? Hell yeah because I am a gamer but can I afford $600 maybe but I am perfectly fine with not having wireless and HD format as DvD's look perfectly fine to me.  The thing is I am sure over time I will buy a ps3 though it will have to be $400 or less though by that time the 360 will be cheaper so the 360 will ALWAYS be ahead in my opinion.  Bottomline is the 360 has way more games at the moment and is cheaper if you only buy what you need to play the games you want.  Now with the price drop coming up it will be an even better value compared to the ps3 if you don't want the blue-ray or wireless setup etc.  Those are nice things to have but not needed for gaming :)