theRepublic said:
Without playing the game, how do you know that the same sort of innuendo in the first two is not present in this one? I would guess that they tried to keep the writing similar. It was not a "T game that made it into a E game". The original two games were both E rated. Innuedo is allowed in because it goes over the heads of the little kids. Think about something like Shrek. Kids like it because it is a slapstick cartoon/fairytale, and the adults appreciate all the little jokes. All this while maintaining a kid friendly rating. Also, it has been awhile since I've played these games, but I don't remember that much innuendo. Of course there is violence as you said. You are constantly fighting enemies, but that is in every game. And the violence in this game is cartoon violence.
(Because I couldn't resist a Scrubs referance: Inyourendo) |
however, if the game includes this same kind of stuff (innuendo), then I will stop talking right here... but it doesn't seem like that is the direction they are pursuing. im sorry rep i'm not trying to be combatative but i do appreciate when people read what i write before responding to it. i did write this, and then you asked me how do i know that innuendo is not going to be included.
as for the writing, and the direction, rare has and always was a genius endeavor of the stamper brothers, and since they have left, they haven't done anything correctly.
as far as innuendo, they did have bold faced stuff too. just go to youtube and type in "banjo kazooie e?" there's plenty, some is conspiracy stuff, some is blod faced, like where kazooie asks a tree, whom describes himself as shriveled, how his nuts are.
you should check it out. but i have always remembered B+K to be a little more than a kids game. remember this was at a time when the censors weren't really in full swing. They slipped a lot of stuff in there that you just don't realize maybe.
