| steven787 said:
Edit: That quote is funny. He is saying what I said. The positive effects of more revenue and more money in the pockets of the private citizen are positive, but the lasting effects (efficiency gains) can be far different than the short term. There is another issue, this doesn't address his plan. People are not better off today than they were 8 years ago. Their real income is lower. |
Steven's last point is the most important one. Studies have been done showing that everyone is better off under democrats on average over the last century, while only the rich are better off under Republicans (the super rich at that). The big reason is the consumer spending point Steven makes. Poor and middle class people have more money so they spend more which gives more money to everyone working in jobs that require consumer spending to function (more or less every non defense job). Rich people owning these companies benefit as do their workers, win win. Look at the Clinton years vs the Bush years (either Bush) or the Kenedy/Johnson years vs the Nixon ones. Democrats nearly always (other then Carter) are better stewards of the economy then Republicans, suply side DOES NOT WORK, rich people don't spend the money domesticly, they spend it internationally and the tax losses become huge debts.
PSN ID: ChosenOne feel free to add me







