Timmah! said:
The US is very lenient on freedom of the press. In the US, you can pretty much publish anything you want, even if it is hate filled BS, a leaked document from the government, pornography, etc. There are really no laws governing what can be published (aside from child porn, for obvious reasons), just laws that limit the availability of certain things to certain settings & age groups. The US has had no bannings of movies, books, or newspapers (nationally) in it's recent history. Some movies will be given an NC-17 rating, and that pretty much kills them, or games given an AO rating, which pretty much kills them, but the government itself is not in the business of limiting speech by banning speach by law or punishing the speaker or writer for their opinions.
Like Kasz said, the list you gave is going to be skewed because arrests of journalists are not due to what they reported, but the fact that they would not reveal the source that illegally released classified documents. The US does not prosecute journalists for publishing classified information, but instead goes after the person who leaked the info in the first place.
The Racial and Religious Hatred Act actually outlaws certain types of speech in the UK, namely speech that "inciting (or 'stirring up') hatred against a person on the grounds of their religion" is illegal. In the US, we have no laws that restrict what opinions are legal or not legal to either speak or print. Due to this fact alone, the US has fewer restrictions on speach than the UK.
|
