TruckOSaurus said:
Maybe you should read a bit more on the theory of evolution... nature doesn't decide anything : The strongest members of a species survive in greater number because of x attribute so that attribute is more likely to be passed on to the next generations while the members with useless attribute y don't survive as well so with time this attribute disapears.
|
Survival of the fittest is absolutely incorrect. If there were a human who was born with a complete immunity to diseases but was sterile he would not help advance the species despite being the fittest. It is reproduction of the reproducers. It is more influenced by who can get the most pregnant than any other fator.







