colonelstubbs said:
TRios_Zen said:
I agree, the 360's future is completely bright.
As for the rest of your questions, well, I enjoy the games they are putting on the 360 so am not all that concerned about the fiscal decisions you seem to be focused on. Let me try though:
- Exactly what was the cost of the price cut? I mean the system is 3 years old now?
- To what extent did MS base the success of the 360 on the HD format? Pretty sure they didn't. Do you have a cost estimate here?
- Live is still charging and people are still paying... what costs there?
- Related to HD, I'm not sure what COST not having a Blu Ray player is to the 360, maybe you have a guess here?
- I'll agree they spent money on exculsive content and games. Damn them for giving me MORE reason to enjoy my 360!!
Since you are a fan of the 360 I guess I could see why you might want to discuss this. Oh wait...seems like only PS3 fans are posting in here...interesting... |
Why is that interesting? This thread is in the gaming discussion, not the microsoft forum
|
Sorry, I was being facetious, I actually dont find it surprising at all, just funny. Come on stubbs though, I read your stuff, you are a smart poster...clearly this is only about MS' performance and easily could be located in the MS forum...
It isn't, as I'm pretty sure the intent is NOT to paint the 360 in a good light...agreed?
