By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dno on 09 September 2008
Edit Thread
badgenome said:
z101 said:

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Sorry dude, that's bullcrap. Microsoft probably spends more money buying exclusives, games, and content than Nintendo and Sony combined. Their first party games might not be as frequent, but they are arguably just as good, and exclusives aren't the only thing that Microsoft has bought for its customers. Hint: Final Fantasy XIII, Star Ocean 4.

 

Hint: "infinite undiscovery". It seems that Square Enix takes the MS-Money chuckling and will release only crap games for the xbox.

Nintendo don't need to buy exclusive games because Nintendo has fantastic Teams that make games. MS has not one good team so they need to buy games.

Wow. Your posts are often unadulterated crap, but this one takes the cake.

1. Square-Enix only stepped in as the publisher late in the game. Probably for the same reason that Squaresoft originally published Breath of Fire for Capcom. Infinite Undiscovery was going to get released on the 360 whether S-E published it or Microsoft did.

2. Infinite Undiscovery is far from crap.

3. Microsoft can't hold a candle to Nintendo, but as they have Lionhead and Rare, I hope what you meant was, "MS has not one good team, but two."

 

 fable 1 was "ok" fable 2 has not come out and rare has suck since star fox.

So i think what he means is M$ has 2 "ok" teams"