The most important sport newspaper of my country, which since it isn't British nor Italian has no reason to be biased, ended the article with this phrase (translated by me after it):
Cuando ocurren estos hechos, como el recargo postrero a Lewis Hamilton a pesar de que no sacó ventaja en el entuerto con Kimi Räikkönen, en Fórmula 1 se recuerda la "regla del auto rojo", como llaman a la supuesta inclinación de la FIA a favorecer a Ferrari. Los sucesos en Bélgica no ayudan a despejar las suspicacias.
When these things happen, like the post-race recharge to Hamilton, even when he gained no advantage of the incident with Raikkonen, in Formula 1 is often remembered the "rule of the red car", as they call the supposed inclination of the FIA to favour Ferrari. The events in Belgium don't help to erase the suspicion.
Also, before they mentioned some events when Ferrari was clearly favoured, and they say that Bruno Senna in GP2 (the category inmediately below F1) did exactly the same as Massa in Valencia (exiting pits and almost crashing) and was given a drive-through. Of course, Massa wasn't.
