By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ManusJustus said:
highwaystar101 said:

People have made it their business to attack her personal life and not her proffesional life, which I think is just plain dirty.

Here's the thing, conservatives like this woman attack everyone's personal life.  They want absistence only education, they want Creationism in schools, they want to ban same-sex relationships, they want to take women's rights to birth control away, and so forth.

If someone tells me who I can marry and what other personal decisions I can make, I think its perfectly fine to attack their flawed character.

 

Ok, now you're just puking up left wing dribble. NOBODY in the government wants to ban same-sex relationships. There's a huge difference between banning a relationship, and not wanting to change the legal definition of Marriage. I fully support civil unions to grant the same rights to same-sex couples. I think this is the best compromise for both sides. We don't all want 'abstinance only', I support teaching both abstinance and birth control. Nobody wants to take away a Woman's right to birth control, that's far and away from wanting to take away the so-called 'right' to kill an innocent, defenseless unborn baby- this has no bearing at all on the many other forms of contraception. And what of creationism? Why not present more than one side of a debate?? Isn't that the point of an education? I've never heard any politician support teaching ONLY creationsim.

Disagreement with somebody does not give anybody a right to slime their family and personal life in this way. Period.