Lair, a different opinion after EGM's review?

[HappySqurriel]

leo-j said:

Rath said:

Killzone3 said:

Rath said:
@iclim.

As far as I can see they arent biased, its just sony fans trying to discredit their review on lair -.-

Watch the shows people.

Watch them talk about halo3 and killzone2 in the same show and tell me they arent anti PS3, they do their best to defend Halo3 weak showing while they do their best to kill the Killzone hype. Being overly skeptical after the trailer.

They are overly defencive of Halos weak showing, yet overly skeptycal over a Killzones great showing.

Tbh. The first Killzone got 73.2%, Halo got 95.6% and Halo 2 got 94.6%. (numbers from gamerankings)

Can you see why they may be sceptical for KZ2 and not for Halo3? 

 

Also you may not realise this but other people than you have different opinions, just because they dont agree with you doesnt make them biased. 

Why do all the 360 fanboys keep bringing up the first killzone(no offense not calling you a fanboy) there idiots they dont know crud about the game. And when you bring it up they say "The first one sucked and the secound one will suck"...they just dont get it, was the first game nominated for best of e3..more importantly was halo 3 nominated for best of e3..And dont take this as an offense Im just using your post as an example..

Best of E3 = Fun 5 minute demo, looks good, cute booth babe and lots of PR guys giving free swag The truth about Killzone was that it was hyped (beyond belief) to be a Halo 2 killer and failed to come close to Halo 2 in critical acclaim or sales; Killzone 2 may be better than Killzone but I'm not sure a company can go from producing games that get reviews in the 75% range to getting reviews in the 95% range ... I'm also not sure a game series can go from selling (roughly) 1 Million copies to selling 5+ million copies.