HappySqurriel said:
Actually, most scholars believe that the Bible (and similar religious texts) are based on folk-tales which were (in most cases) based on real people and real events ... This doesn't mean that what is in the Bible should be considered literal fact, but you shouldn't dismiss it as simply being "myths" either. |
So you think that the word "myth" is being used here in a pejorative sense? I believe Rubang specifically refers to the particular story which in the bible is the story of the immaculate conception. Are you also referring to that as one of the folk-tales that was based on a real event?








