Ail said:
The people working in the industry are the one feeling the effect not the theorist sitting in his chair in whichever university.... That's like saying we shoudn't ask people working in mines if the work conditions are bad but should have some outsiders sitting in Washington do a study about it.. Do you realize the irony of what you are saying ?
I know piracy cost my companie about 10% in revenue the last 3 years that we know off ( that's the customers we caught and sued so we know that number for sure) and that we had to spent about 8 man months of development to make the software a little harder to pirate. That is a fact, not some study with an agenda. FACTS, that's what I am talking about..
|
You know that all 10% of those customers would of paid for it?
You are taking the same flawed approach to piracy. Looking at every pirated copy you can find and treating it as a lost sale.
That's exactly why you don't know what your talking about. You aren't taking an actual researched look on it.
It's like saying that anyone who would except a free pizza given out on the street would in fact have purchased that pizza.
Haven't you ever eaten somewhere before you didn't perfer or didn't usually eat at because you got a really good deal? Or because a party was being held there and the food was free? Etc.
At most you could argue that by eating that Pizza, they aren't buying another piece of food they would perfer.
Even that analogy falls apart because people NEED food. They don't need Warcraft 3. Which is why a direct "Downloads = lost sales" or "People we caught" methodology is about as far from correct as one could get.
Or got a gift from someone you would of never bought yourself but later liked and kept... or liekd but would of never bought for the price they sold for?
You've never gotten something for free you had no intention of buying?








