HappySqurriel said:
Does that mean that someone who is against teaching religion in school is necessarily against teaching religion at home? There are lots of parents in the world who believe that art, music and physical education should not be taught in schools because they do a poor job of it, and it takes away resources from core subjects where American students are struggling; does this mean that they would (necessarily) reject students from learning about these subjects outside of a school setting? I personally grew up in a household where I played two insturments, played multiple sports, learned to draw and paint and my parents hated that the public education system devoted so many resources to programs where students gained 2 years of education in 12 years. There are hundreds of reasons why people believe something should or should not be taught in school, you can not jump to conclusions about what they believe should be taught in the home based on what they think should be taught in schools. The only logical conclusion you can come to from knowing she supports absistence-only sexual education in school is that she supports absistence-only sexual education in school. |
Oh Happy Squirriel, do you really want to make an argument like that? The epistemlogical implications of your own logic would reduce your pronouncement to a statement that has no connection to anything but itself. I did find your colorful anecdotal interpolations quite interesting. But if you want to take every statement and make it a tautology then okay.
