Sqrl said:
Did you bother to read what I wrote? Read it again, then respond. I quite clearly called them allegations and pointed out the need for more information. Jumping to conclusions about what I've wrote and then asking me to defend them is not a platform for a reasoned debate. Perhaps with a timeline of events as they are alleged, and an understanding of what went on behind the scenes of any possible charges or IA investigations into those charges I could answer that question. But without those things I would be taking a stab in the dark, as would you. |
Yes I read what you wrote.
Okay, I read it again. Nothing changed.
Oh crap, the post I'm quoting just doubled in size within the time I was reading your last post and hit Quote.
I said "if" and was asking a hypothetical. If somebody's drunk on the job, you fire them before there's family drama. If they're not drunk on the job, you don't make up a bunch of crap after there's family drama. I don't know what happened, but the other guy they fired says they called him 24 times to pressure him to fire Wooten, and Palin's husband has already admitted to pressuring the guy to fire Wooten. I'll just leave it at this: "It's fishy as hell." I'll reserve judgment beyond how fishy it is until October, unless there's a big break in the case and more shit hits the fan.
And since McCain didn't vet her at all, he didn't know she had a private lawyer to defend her during the investigation.
The investigation is due to file their report on October 31st. It's like McCain picked the candidate based on the biggest surprise right before we vote. Or it's like he said, he just had a gut feeling that she was his soul mate.
