Coca-Cola said:
or the religious right will like the fact that Palin is not hiding this fact and taking the responsibility to take care of the baby. If they like her they will forgive her. Also, this news does not prove anything about parents. some kids just make mistakes. this election is creating a lot of buzz. |
Well, she did hide it for 5 months, only coming out when it was less damaging to her career than not coming out. Not that hiding it was wrong as it was her family's personal life (if the earlier rumor had been true then it would have been wrong because they wouldn't have merely shut up about a private matter but have actively covered it up) and she had a political interest in keeping it that way (as the fundies will not like this).
Also, I feel that it is about the best way they could have dealt with it (except maybe the daughter's wedding IF it is a shotgun wedding and not a decision by the two young parents) and I do not feel like it diminishes her potential capacities as VP.
As for her strange plane trip, like happySqurriel said in the other thread given that trig was premature (i.e. she was not expecting labour yet) and her water broke possibly differently than her other pregnancies then I can understand her not thinking a plane trip home would be a problem (if she did expect labor and still got on the plane then she would be negligent but hindsight can hinder as well as help sometime as we do not always kow what the person taking the decision at the time knew or didn't know).
@Akuma: about storks (hopefully you will get the reference):
@BigJon: I do not know how religious you are but for a truly religious person that believes in the truth of Bible (all of it or at least as much as they are told about it) morality is derived solely from god so that if he or his representative tells you to stone a man to death for picking up some wood on the wrong day then stoning him to death is the moral thing to do. With such a mindset why would it be hard to believe that god would do such a "mild" thing as "cursing" a whole part of mankind with a black skin when he genocided almost all of mankind just a short time before that (the genocide part being why the subsequent curse theory is mild by comparison).
Now I am not saying that it is a good thing to accept things that easily and I am not saying that Obama is such a person but it is not just a question of "my preacher said something I didn't like therefore I will leave" as most religions say that you must trust in god and ask him for understanding for what you have difficulties believing, even foregoing the use of your brain in favour of using your faith. It is a whole mental conditioning that needs to be broken down once it is in place (or somebody to point out a contradicting passage of scripture accepted by that person) as it goes against the very nature of who they are.
Also, about your response to Akuma seemingly coming from the far right, he might not necessarily but might simply be trying to judge how her family holds up against the moral system that they claim to follow. e.g. he might not have a problem if Hillary was the Dem's candidate and Chelsea became pregnant out of wedlock if the Clintons never said that it was a bad and immoral thing to do whereas with the Palin family he would have a problem because they claim that such a thing is bad and immoral. In other word he helds them up to their own moral standards to see if they pass muster not necessarily his own.
Like on a scare of 1-10 1 being conservative 10 being liberal, I would be like 4. The problem is whether you realize it or not many of you are 9s and 10s.
But to them you appear like a 1 or 2 and they might be a 6 appearing a 9 or 10 in your company. each difference on either side being accented by contrast (like putting one hand in a bowl of mildly cold water and the other in a bowl of mildly hot water makes one hand feel like in a very cold water bowl and the other feel like in a very hot water bowl).
"I do not suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it"
