Timmah! on 01 September 2008
| The Ghost of RubangB said: There was already an investigation. She ordered an additional investigation of her own to show her cooperation. Not a bad idea. However, she and her staff made 24 phone calls to the guy to pressure him to fire Wooten. They used to like him, but as soon as the divorce hit, it was suddenly "He's an abusive drunk AND HE TAZERED OUR BABY!" time. |
First let me say, you crack me up, even if I do disagree with you 99.999% of the time, you're still one of the most creative posters of all times, kudos to you on that.
And like you wouldn't fire the guy if you thought he was a big fat jerk to your sister (I know I would). I'm not saying it was right, just that it's not quite as bad as some people are making it out to be. It could be concidered an ethics issue, but not corruption. I would say the same thing if republicans were blowing something similar out of proportion about a democrat. It's overblown. The best argument against her is lack of experience, not this and that her husband got a DWI 24 years ago. They are just reaching at this point.
