ManusJustus said:
Fixed. The Republican led investigation into the unethical firing of ther ex-brother in law should clear things up for us. |
Yeah, the investigation that SHE ORDERED to answer questions, and that she is cooperating fully with. I would hardly call firing somebody over a personal issue 'corruption'. If that's the best you've got, you're just reaching. She has a great record of going after wasteful spending (example, the 'bridge to nowhere' project), corruption (real corruption, such as money issues and back room deals, including those in her own party). You are such a blind partisan that you can't even recognize ANY positive facts about somebody you disagree with. I recognize that Obama has done some great things, seems to have good moral character, and has some really good points on certain social issues. I just disagree with his policies, so I can't vote for him. You on the other hand, can't see anything positive about anybody you disagree with. This is not condusive to real debate.
