forevercloud3000 said:
took 3 generations to get it right? What do you mean. Yes, the PS2 has a small failure rate, about 12%, but no where near 360 percentage. The PS1 was a SUPER sturdy system, that even after a royal thrashing the thing just would not die. The slim PS2 work perfectly. The PS3 is just as good as the slim PS2 and PS1 in that department. So that means there was only one incedent with faulty Sony hardware. The PS1 and PS3 success rate outnumbers the PS2's failure rate so in all Sony still can make great hardware.2~1 As for MS's Xbox, it was sturdy too, there were no hardware malfunctions that I know of. Then they rushed the 360 out the gate to get the jump on the market leader, sony. The system is crappily made above all else. That leaves MS with 1~1 Sony wins this one too I am afraid Squilliam.... |
http://www.zen8750.zen.co.uk/stats.htm Average failure time 17 months after launch. So a lot of people could have been out of pocket on launch PS2s. Since you know, you're comparing launch Xbox 360s to launch PS2s its only fair.
For the PS1 its all anecdotes but what I do know is that the N64s are vastly more reliable than the PS1. You didn't have to run them upside down or anything...
Microsoft still wins.
Tease.
