ItsaMii on 30 August 2008
| Sky Render said: Instead of making ridiculously complicated numeric claims, you could just admit that you mis-worded it and should have said that most companies are not AS profitable as the top-selling companies. To which I say, of course not. Profit, however small, is still profit. Just because a handful of businesses reap immense profits does not mean that the businesses on the lower end of the spectrum do not reap any. It is irrelevant, actually, that those big players do make so much; the fact that profit remains to be made is why there are competitors that make up the other 20% of the market. If it weren't at least marginally profitable, they'd get out of the business or be forced out. |
You are making correct assumptions on wrong data. That 400 + games is either with every downloadable game included or different version of the same game counting as different games (PAL, NTSC, special editions). He said he took it from Metacritic. The revenue numbers is also based on a ridiculous assumption (all games sell at full price, there isn`t any bundles).
Satan said:
"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."
