GamesRadar's Leipzig preliminary reviews.

[Jackson50]

Griffin said:

Jackson50 said:

Torillian said:

http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3169561&p=37

http://www.joystiq.com/2008/08/25/joystiq-hands-on-killzone-2-multiplayer/

http://gamesblog.ugo.com/index.php/gamesblog/more/killzone_2_multiplayer_hands_on_preview

if GamesRadar's handson is "evidence" then I guess I win since I have more ^^

 

I value GamesRadar's opionon more than I do those other sites. It is the same as me valuing Roger Ebert's opinion about movies more than other reviewers. If you value the opinion of those other sites more than GR, then KZ2's MP looks promising. If you value GR's opinion more than the opinions of the other sites, then KZ2's MP does not look so promising.

 

GR has no opinion, that bitch never even played the fucking game, he made up a bunch of fucking nonsense that is pure lies.

How is GR's opinion on the controls and the gameplay a lie? I thought it was understood that a review is someone's evaluation of something and that it is entirely subjective?