Err... Strictly speaking this should be titled 'MS gets money from Immersion'.
Sony paid Immersion money to settle a legal dispute. That money is now in their bank balance along with other money they earn - I'm presuming that the money from Sony does not constitute their total earnings.
Immersion owes MS money due to a clause stating if they settle with Sony they owe MS money - and pays after legal dispute.
Unless Sony paid Immersion with money marked 'Sony' and Immersion specifically paid MS with the same money then from a financial point of view the money should be considered Immersions.
Also, Immersion should chew out their lawyers for either not spotting or not arguing to alter such a stupid clause in the first place.
BTW I don't like mods posting titles, etc. such as this which are clearly flame bait. If they have an issue with other posts they handle it via PM, etc. This is not how you set an example.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
