By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ssj12 said:
naznatips said:
ssj12 said:

Check this out: http://www.guzer.com/videos/awesome_vr_game.php

this is how gaming should be going (see previous arguements).

Going by this, the PlayStation Eye is closer to this tech then the Nintendo Wii. This would be a way more fun way to play games.


The PSEye is no closer to doing this than the Wiimote. Why does every single thing you find on the internet have to be made into a way you think the PS3 is better than the Wii? Also, this is REALLY old.


umm yes it is....

PSeye VR Motion/Sound Cap
Motion Capture: Check Check
Fast Capture: - Check
Sound Capture: Check Check
Capture full motion: - Check
Capture Minor motion: Check Check

 

The PS Eye is a few steps below but it is in the evolutionary path to that. And yes its old but hey its still more advanced tech.

Yes i know that was a horrid chart but for a 2 second type up it shows some of the differences.


Whoa wait take a lot of steps back.  You are making some big jumps.

Just because it can capture motion doesn't mean it can translate motion into any sort of 3 dimensional object.  So far the PS3 eye has only been able to sense simple movement, not full body range motion.  This is thousands of miles away.  The Wiimote has a mic chip in it too, so yeah, Motion, minor motion, fast motion, and sound are all captured by the Wiimote.  This is no more like the PSeye than a digital camera.  The technology is enormously different.  It's like comparing the Power Glove to the Wiimote.  There are similar functions (losely) but very very different technologies involved.