CGI-Quality said:
It wasnt about that it was that Square - 1. promised it would remain exclusive 2. claimed it was taking full advantage of PS3 (even tho they still say this despite the multiplat announcement) and 3. people were really looking forward to buying a PS3 for this exact title and how much of that was a slap in the face basically saying: "hey Sony look your biggest rival will have your biggest exclusive along with u" that's basically the same if Sony went after Gears 3 how bad would that affect M$ if their biggest rival took their (technically) second best exclusive and made it a PS3 multiplat title. |
1. Companies lie.
2. How is that different than pre-release hype for any game, then after release they say "we only used XX% of the power".
3. -First, it never was Sony's. It's Square Enix's
-Second, Sony owns a small portion of SE, they have the movie distribution rights; Sony probably had an offer to keep exclusivity. They will probably make back everything exclusivity lost.
Why does it matter to you if one system sells more than another if both are selling well and profitable?
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
