There's a big logical flaw in most of the arguments coming from both sides.
The sales and success of a console are independent of the other consoles.
The lowest selling one could still turn a great profit, and be considered a success by it manufacturer (see: Gamecube)
The 360 could end up 2nd or 3rd, but have a tremendous attach rate and have moderately profitable hardware and be considered a success to both the manufacturer and publishers.
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.







